Both bills included language the association opposes related to voluntary sodium targets and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) retailer stocking standards rule. . Tester, J.M. You can see they’re my type of people; you feel like you would help them. Their perceptions towards the stricter stocking standards were summarized across four themes: (1) the proposed standards would benefit their customers; (2) carrying additional healthful foods would result in higher profits; (3) the concern about whether SNAP participants would purchase a greater array of healthful food; and (4) the logistical challenges they would face in sourcing and selling additional … Spanish interviews were translated into English prior to analysis. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation and Costs. Despite knowing there could be some logistical difficulties, the owners/managers generally did not think these were insurmountable hurdles. Although the proposed policy in 2016 has been tabled, similar proposals are likely to arise in the future in the ongoing national discussion to improve the delivery of SNAP. Arguments Used in Public Comments to Support or Oppose the US Department of Agriculture’s Minimum Stocking Requirements: A Content Analysis. ; Odoms-Young, A.; McCoy, T.; et al. In San Francisco, these zip codes were 94102, 94103, 94124, 94130, and 94134, ranging from 8.6 to 26.8% SNAP households. Store owners/managers had a generally favorable response towards the proposed stricter stocking standards. ; Writing—reviewing and editing, J.M.T., I.H.Y., B.A.L. Additional themes discussed pertained to the concern about whether stocking changes would lead SNAP participants to purchase more healthful food and some logistical challenges related to sourcing and storing perishable foods. 1601. I feel it could help them to eat better and helps us as well.”, In a similar vein, the second theme focused on the positive impact that carrying more healthful foods could have on their store’s profits. Blue Point Packaging Standards. Because this is where they purchase (their food).” This sentiment was also echoed by an Oakland respondent who said, “Most of the neighborhood has food stamps. ; Villamor, E.; Rimm, E.B. those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). Logistics Management Excellence Award 1902. Leung, C.W. Standards of Ethical Behavior 1700. This webinar presents those requirements, as modified by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017. Thomas, D.R. They only have EBT. Undergraduate Program, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland, Oakland, CA 94609, USA, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA, Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA, Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. They are usually prepared at home and eaten as a meal. . Blue Point Brandmark Guidelines. Haynes-Maslow, L.; Andress, L.; Jilcott Pitts, S.; Osborne, I.; Baquero, B.; Bailey-Davis, L.; Byker-Shanks, C.; Houghtaling, B.; Kolodinsky, J.; Lo, B.K. In total, 30 stores were eligible from San Francisco and 28 stores were eligible from Oakland. Other challenges discussed included limited space to store or display food. All interviews were conducted between May and September 2016. With input from pro athletes and equipment managers Wizard Sports continues to offer the best in game and practice sports equipment. Chalk snap lines where cases are to be located. The USDA should implement new stocking rules that increase the availability of healthy foods at SNAP retailers. Requisitioning is a simple method for agencies to acquire products directly from GSA. Conceptualization, J.M.T., I.H.Y., B.A.L. One San Francisco respondent said, “(The new standards are) good…But, it depends if the customers are willing to buy it. Bahco Packaging Standards. This study was considered exempt by the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Institutional Review Board because research data were obtained in a manner where the human subject could not be identified (IRB# 16-18826, 02/13/2016). That’s usually a deciding factor with a lot of stores—whether they want to be a (convenience store) or a store known for their produce.”. Thus, to participate in SNAP, retailers have to stock at least 36 staple food items (4 staple food categories x 3 varieties x 3 stocking units) on their shelves. As one San Francisco respondent described, “If the program required (stores) to carry healthier foods, people would be exposed to them more often. ; Pelletier, J.E. 1. This proposed rule is expected to be an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory action that seeks to ease the staple food stocking requirements for SNAP authorized retailers. Logistics Readiness Excellence Award 1903. MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. We care about EBT because we have a lot of money from EBT.”, Despite their overall positive attitudes, a third theme involved some concern that SNAP participants would not buy the additional foods even if the stores increased their stock, saying that it was ultimately up to the customers to decide if they wanted to eat healthier. SNAP authorized stores must meet one of two staple food requirements: 1. Whatever they order from me, I will voluntarily get it. ; Spector, P.; Gomez, J. Examining the Feasibility of Healthy Minimum Stocking Standards for Small Food Stores. Additional themes discussed pertained to the concern about whether stocking changes would lead SNAP participants to purchase more healthful food and some logistical challenges related to sourcing and storing perishable foods. Gittelsohn, J.; Laska, M.N. While some owners/managers believed their stores already carried sufficient quantities of healthier foods to comply with the USDA proposal, several others expressed willingness to make additional changes to comply with the stricter standards while also noting some of the challenges they may encounter in doing so. Verbal consent to audio-record the interview was also obtained. A San Francisco respondent said, “(I would make the changes) if it was required. Specific to the stocking standards proposed by USDA, store owners/managers expressed overall support for initial guidelines, but also discussed their concerns about whether SNAP participants would purchase a greater array of healthful foods and the logistical concerns they might face in sourcing and selling certain food items. The statements, opinions and data contained in the journals are solely Four themes emerged from owners/managers’ discussion of their overall perceptions of SNAP: the beneficial impact of SNAP on their business, how SNAP enables them to connect with the broader community, the importance of SNAP in preventing hunger, and the nutrition-related struggles that SNAP participants face. The data from the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Proposed changes to SNAP stocking standards need to be feasible, sustainable, and garner broad support across multiple groups of stakeholders if they are to be effective. Supply Department Awards 1901. In particular, the proposed changes would aid small format retailers in meeting the enhanced stocking requirements of the 2016 final rule, “Enhancing Retailer Standards in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” by … Store owners/managers had a generally favorable response towards the proposed stricter stocking standards. The first theme that emerged was the beneficial impact of SNAP on small food stores. Please wait while we gather your results. We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience. Households: Fiscal Year 2016, Evaluation of the Healthy Incentives Pilot (HIP): Final Report, SNAP-Ed. Most stores are authorized under Eligibility Criterion A. It would make it more likely for people to purchase it using (SNAP) due to the exposure of it. In order to be eligible to accept SNAP benefits, under Section 3(o)(1) of the Act, a retailer must “sell food for home preparation and consumption” as well as meet other criteria in the Act and SNAP regulations. Karpyn and colleagues interviewed small food store owners/managers in four states [, Since the interviews in the present study were conducted, substantial changes were made to the proposed stocking guidelines, in part because due to comments received by USDA during a public comment period. We have fruit and vegetables here—look, nice apples, top of the line—nobody buys it. The customer is going to choose what (they’re) going to buy or not.”, The final theme centered around the logistical challenges of sourcing and storing additional food, particularly perishable items. However, the food environments in San Francisco and Oakland are notable in that they are “food swamps” (i.e., areas with a high abundance of unhealthy food stores), the stores are predominantly run by immigrant families, and the stores also serve a diverse clientele due to the high walkability of the neighborhoods located within the zip codes surveyed [. The study’s methodology was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board. Revised WIC food package improves diets of WIC families. Secure .gov websites use HTTPSA lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. The panel’s recommendations focus on foods intended to be consumed routinely for meals, rather than snacks. The new SNAP stocking rule states that in order to be eligible to participate in SNAP as a retailer, stores must comply with either Criterion A or Criterion B. Steele-Adjognon, M.; Weatherspoon, D. Double Up Food Bucks program effects on SNAP recipients’ fruit and vegetable purchases. ; Data collection, A.M. and C.W.L. Bahco Brandmark Standards. Available online: Bartlett, S.; Klerman, J.; Olsho, L.; Logan, C.; Blocklin, M.; Beauregard, M.; Enver, A.; Associates, A. Hersey, J.C.; Cates, S.C.; Blitstein, J.L. This provision could cause more unhealthy foods to qualify as staple foods for SNAP participants. Haynes-Maslow, L.; Osborne, I.; Jilcott Pitts, S.; Sitaker, M.; Byker Shanks, C.; Leone, L.A.; Maldonado, A.; McGuirt, J.; Andress, L.; Bailey-Davis, L.; et al. This study aimed to explore the opinions of store owners/managers of SNAP-authorized small food stores about their overall perceptions of the program and the stricter stocking standards previously proposed in 2016. Academic Editor: Jessica C. Kiefte-de Jong, Received: 22 January 2021 / Revised: 21 February 2021 / Accepted: 23 February 2021 / Published: 26 February 2021, (This article belongs to the Special Issue. If I make some money, right? The CalFresh Program, federally known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), issues monthly electronic benefits that can be used to buy most foods at many markets and food stores. Nobody buys it.” Other respondents discussed their beliefs that SNAP was already a good program and its recipients will buy what they want without being “forced” into buying healthier food. To source his produce, he traveled to the produce market before opening his store. Section 3(k)(1) of the Act defines “food” to include “any food or food product for home consumption except . JMT was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD07582). I am sure in this neighborhood, you can help a lot of people.”, The third theme was how they perceived the importance of SNAP in providing food and preventing hunger. Errors and fraud by households applying for SNAP benefits can result in On Dec. 15, 2016, FNS published Enhancing Retailer Standards in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), a final rule that revised stocking requirements for stores. One Oakland respondent who owned two small food stores said, “We have another business and that one would probably need to have more space, maybe bring (in) more machines. One Oakland owner/manager said, “Some people that come here are not able to work. Brandmark Guidelines. Interviews were analyzed for thematic content using the general inductive approach. You just have to (accept it) in this neighborhood.”, The second theme was the role of SNAP in allowing small food stores to connect with the broader community. Official websites use .govA .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. ; Ohri-Vachaspati, P.; Deahl-Greenlaw, A.; Ughwanogho, O.; Jilcott Pitts, S.B. Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. ; Li, Y.; Anderson Steeves, E.; Castro, I.A. 28 May 2020. The interviewers followed a standardized recruitment script that described the purpose of the study. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly the Food Stamp Program, is the largest of the federal nutrition assistance programs, reaching 35.7 million low-income Americans in 2019 [, Nutrition-related interventions have focused on SNAP-authorized food retailers, which represent a network of approximately 260,000 food stores, including supermarkets, grocery stores, superstores, convenience stores, farmer’s markets, and more [, Although the majority of SNAP benefits are redeemed at supermarkets and supercenters, small food stores comprise over 45% of all SNAP-authorized retailers and are fundamental to the local food environment, particularly in low-income communities and areas without large grocery stores [. Transl Behav Med. The proposed rule would substantially undermine the purpose of SNAP stocking standards and could lead to greater SNAP use at outlets with limited options and outlets that sell primarily unhealthy foods, such as liquor, dollar, and corner stores. They basically rely on food stamps to maintain their health. What else has changed? We have a lot of EBT customers. An Oakland respondent described making special deals when he knew SNAP customers would be more likely to shop as his store: “I see (my customers) five to ten times each day, all of them. This webinar presents those requirements, as modified by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017. SNAP, $SNAP, Snap Inc stock technical analysis with charts, breakout and price targets, support and resistance levels, and more trend analysis indicators Health, food and agricultural policy should seek to reduce the size, influence, and subsidies provided … In addition, the USDA should study the feasibility of including evidence-based product-placement strategies and restrictions on the marketing of unhealthy products in SNAP retailer standards. To continue to accept SNAP benefits, a store that is authorized under Criterion A must have a minimum of 3 varieties of staple food items for each of the 4 staple food categories. The requirements are effective Jan. 17, 2018. Nutrition-related interventions have focused on SNAP-authorized food retailers, but the perspectives of small food store owners and managers have not been represented in national policy discussions. Participants were store owners and managers of SNAP-authorized small food stores in San Francisco and Oakland, California. ; Singleton, C.R. Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.